Outcomes after open versus laparoscopic gastric bypass.

نویسندگان

  • Rocco Ricciardi
  • Robert J Town
  • Todd A Kellogg
  • Sayeed Ikramuddin
  • Nancy N Baxter
چکیده

In expert hands, laparoscopic gastric bypass (LGB) is associated with reduced morbidity and mortality compared with open bariatric surgery. The purpose of our study was to determine whether or not the results of LGB have been realized in the general US population. We used data from the nationwide inpatient sample to define differences in outcomes after LGB versus open techniques (OGB). We calculated hospital stay, in-hospital mortality, and major complications for both OGB and LGB. We noted a total of 26,940 gastric bypass procedures: LGB was coded in 16.3% and OGB in 83.7%. The mean hospital stay, mortality, wound, gastrointestinal, pulmonary, and cardiovascular complications were significantly lower after LGB (P<0.001). After we adjusted for covariates, hospital stay, pulmonary morbidity, and mortality remained significantly lower after LGB (P<0.001). In conclusion, LGB is associated with significantly lower mean hospital stay and with reduced morbidity and mortality as compared with OGB.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Impact of fellowship training on the learning curve for laparoscopic gastric bypass.

BACKGROUND We have previously shown that the learning curve for laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGBP) is approximately 75 cases. Patients have worse outcomes during the learning curve. Our aim was to evaluate the impact of fellowship training on outcomes during a surgeon's early experience with LRYGBP. METHODS The study population consisted of the first 75 consecutive LRYGBP operatio...

متن کامل

Surgical Technique Affects the Incidence of Marginal Ulceration after Roux-en-Y in Gastric Bypass

Background: Marginal ulceration (MU) is a recognized complication of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) surgery. While several possible risk factors have been reported, the mechanism of MU remains incompletely understood. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of surgical technique on the incidence of MU. Methods and Material: This was a retrospective study of 749 patients undergoing RYGB...

متن کامل

Outcomes after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity.

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the short-term outcomes for laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in 275 patients with a follow-up of 1 to 31 months. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA The Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is a highly successful approach to morbid obesity but results in significant perioperative complications. A laparoscopic approach has significant potential to reduce perioperative complications and reco...

متن کامل

Bowel obstruction after Laparoscopic RNY Gastric Bypass

The laparoscopic RNY gastric bypass (LRNYGBP) is the procedure done and with better results in the treatment of morbid obesity [1]. For several years well-designed studies have shown that the effectiveness of the laparoscopic procedure is similar to the open access. LRNYGBP offers advantages over the open procedure in regard to: lower incidence of infections from the wound, less ruptures, short...

متن کامل

Comparison of Laparoscopic Versus Conventional Open Partial Nephrectomy in Dogs

Objective- Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) has been proven to be a safe and effective technique in human. This study was conducted to evaluate the feasibility and safety of utilizing laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in dogs and to compare this technique with open routine partial nephrectomy for the first time in Iran. Design- Experimental study. Animals- Sixteen large mixed-breed femal...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Surgical laparoscopy, endoscopy & percutaneous techniques

دوره 16 5  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2006